Recent Posts

81

Military Aircraft / Re: MiG-29

« Last post by sergeyl on February 20, 2016, 05:29:46 AM »

.                                                                                                  .

82

Military Aircraft / Re: Su-25's

« Last post by sergeyl on February 17, 2016, 05:38:44 PM »

83

Military Aircraft / Re: Helicopters

« Last post by sergeyl on February 09, 2016, 06:12:18 AM »

                                                                                                            .

84

Military Aircraft / Re: Su-27

« Last post by sergeyl on February 02, 2016, 06:51:25 PM »

85

Military Aircraft / Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber

« Last post by sergeyl on February 01, 2016, 04:52:35 PM »

86

Military Aircraft / Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber

« Last post by sergeyl on January 29, 2016, 07:28:01 PM »

87

Military Aircraft / Re: Su-24

« Last post by sergeyl on January 29, 2016, 07:26:32 PM »

[size=78%]                                                                                                    .[/size]

88

Military Aircraft / Re: Su-35

« Last post by sergeyl on January 24, 2016, 05:07:55 PM »

89

Military Aviation News / Re: Lockheed/Boeing are not the winners, will they be the whiners?

« Last post by Webmaster on January 04, 2016, 02:05:27 PM »

Yup, I saw the headlines, it's obviously normal for them.

I don't think it will be an aircraft that will interest me, even with NG building it. We'll see.

I have no interest for now, I guess until prototype or preproduction is unveiled.

90

Military Aviation News / Re: Lockheed/Boeing are not the winners, will they be the whiners?

« Last post by shawn a on November 07, 2015, 06:17:30 AM »

Well, Boeing and Lockheed have decided to protest, and this, my friends, is why America is in decline--The prostitution to corporate profits.
Do any of you readers who have looked at this topic have an opinion?? Or are you just voyeurs?
C'mon, reply...