MILAVIA Forum - Military Aviation Discussion Forum

Author Topic: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber  (Read 31108 times)

Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2013, 06:06:58 PM »

Offline Webmaster

  • MILAVIA Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • General of Flight
  • *******
  • Posts: 2841
  • Country: nl
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #13 on: December 23, 2013, 02:34:55 PM »
That's a nice sunny photo of the jet, it's a good looking plane, but I'm not sure yet if I like the look of this new standard c/s. It's a bit boring, but somehow it does look good on other aircraft like the Su-25SM, which I think is the same grey but a lighter blue. I think the Su-34 would look pretty nice if it had the grey/white scheme of the Su-24M2. Oh well, it's just looks.

I read that all 32 of the initial order for serial Su-34s have now been delivered. So this one, 28, was the last one of the second-to-last batch delivered this year?
  • Interests: Su-15, Su-27, Tu-22, Tornado, RNLAF
Niels Hillebrand
MILAVIA Webmaster

Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #14 on: December 27, 2013, 06:36:14 PM »

Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #15 on: December 31, 2013, 09:58:51 AM »

Offline shawn a

  • Hero of Flight
  • ******
  • Posts: 898
  • Country: us
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #16 on: December 31, 2013, 07:04:24 PM »
OK, what is with the dielectric paint on all the emitting or receiving antennas? By that I mean--I've seen it in almost all the colors of the rainbow, so why does it never seem to be a seamless part of the "camouflage" paint job?

Offline Webmaster

  • MILAVIA Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • General of Flight
  • *******
  • Posts: 2841
  • Country: nl
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2014, 11:37:53 AM »
because then some painter (not from the respray shop, but say a regular maintainer) may then use the wrong paint on these parts? may just be that simple! Also, like this it says 'be careful' with these parts... no need for warning stencils. And then cost...I suppose, but they've got the grey version, so doesn't explain the white... although maybe it has different properties and they're kept separate by not making them both a grey tint?

seamless is not even possible I think but yeah they can pretty closely matched, obviously RuAF doesn't care.
  • Interests: Su-15, Su-27, Tu-22, Tornado, RNLAF
Niels Hillebrand
MILAVIA Webmaster

Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #18 on: January 12, 2014, 09:33:19 PM »
 


 

Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #19 on: January 14, 2014, 10:07:24 AM »





Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2014, 06:59:28 PM »
 

Offline Webmaster

  • MILAVIA Webmaster
  • Administrator
  • General of Flight
  • *******
  • Posts: 2841
  • Country: nl
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #21 on: January 18, 2014, 03:24:13 AM »
Amazing photos Sergey!
  • Interests: Su-15, Su-27, Tu-22, Tornado, RNLAF
Niels Hillebrand
MILAVIA Webmaster

Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2014, 09:43:22 AM »



Offline sergeyl

  • Veteran
  • ****
  • Posts: 138
Re: SU-34/32FN Fullback Long range fighter-bomber
« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2014, 09:56:55 PM »


 



AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com click to vote for MILAVIA