F-35 factory: One aircraft per day by 2016

[tigershark]

F-35 factory: One aircraft per day by 2016
By Grace V. Jean
FORT WORTH, Texas — Inside a manufacturing facility so large that workers routinely bike and ride golf carts down paths named after fighter jets, preparations are underway to begin mass production of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Lockheed Martin Corp. plans to assemble the stealth plane here on a moving assembly line using digital processes and automation techniques that are new to the defense aerospace sector, says Steve O’Bryan of Lockheed Martin’s F-35 business development team.

Though car manufacturers have built millions of vehicles on automated assembly lines, the concept of moving lines has not been applied to military aircraft since World War II.

Modern warplanes typically have been built in small quantities over the course of many years. The Navy’s F/A-18, which has been in production for more than 20 years, is being built at a rate of 42 aircraft per year. But the F-35 Lightning II is expected to be built at an unprecedented rate — as many as 230 fighters per year.

Lockheed has embraced the moving assembly line concept as the linchpin to produce the next-generation fighter in large enough quantities to satisfy U.S. and international sales.
The U.S. military is buying about 2,500 aircraft. Allied nations are purchasing an additional 500 or so. Lockheed Martin officials are expecting foreign military sales to hike the total number to more than 4,000 Joint Strike Fighters.

“You’re really looking at F-16-like numbers,” says O’Bryan.

Once the line ramps up to full-rate production — possibly as early as 2016 — the company estimates it will assemble about 21 fighters per month, or roughly one aircraft per working day.
The moving assembly line is the only way to reach that rate of production, O’Bryan says. The F-35 measures 51 feet in length. “If the plane doesn’t move 51 feet a day … you’re not going to produce one a day.”

There are three variants of the F-35: A conventional take-off and landing aircraft for the Air Force, a short take-off and vertical landing version for the Marine Corps and a carrier-based variant for the Navy.

Lockheed has completed the critical design reviews and last month the first flight of its short take-off and vertical landing variant for the Marine Corps took place.
The initial operating capability for that version is expected in 2012, followed by the conventional takeoff and landing version in 2015, and the carrier version a year after that.
Last December, the first F-35 variant, AA-1, was air-refueled. It will fly from Fort Worth to Edwards Air Force Base in California for preliminary testing.

Along with Lockheed Martin Corp., Northrop Grumman Corp. and BAE Systems are involved in the manufacturing of the F-35. The $299 billion procurement program is the Defense Department’s largest.

Full article
http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/issues/2008/July/F-35fact.htm

[tigershark]

Nobody's impressed with producing 230 F-35s in one year?  In two or three years in theory NATO and some others could be flying 5th generation fighters.  I'm blown away by the sheer amount of fighters LM can produce and how advance their production line is.  Just to give you an idea on just how many fighters that is, I don't think there's that many advance Flankers built added together and operational.  If I'm wrong it will take the second year year then but you get my point.

[Gripen]

Considering the price your paying per plane you should dam well get quick service.

[tigershark]

In time their average out cheaper then Typhoon's and nobody else can make 5th generation aircraft.  Nothing is cheap except Russian built fighters Gripen everything built western is around or more then $100 mil per.   Your be getting the stealth fighter, carries more fuel then a F-15, 40,000 lbs thrust, best defensive-radar suite made, your pilots will be tripping over each other just to get the first slots.  By the way I think the price is to low now we should raise it

[Gripen]

Yeah yeah i know that the F-35 is good, I've just never ever liked it and I never will. i don't like the Raptor either.