MILAVIA Forum - Military Aviation Discussion Forum

Author Topic: Pilot error blamed for crash of Harrier  (Read 6803 times)

Offline tigershark

  • News Editor
  • General of Flight
  • *******
  • Posts: 2025
Pilot error blamed for crash of Harrier
« on: April 11, 2009, 05:54:47 AM »
Pilot error blamed for crash of Harrier
April 8, 2009 - 8:53 AM
Drew C. Wilson
Havelock News

Pilot error is blamed for the crash of an AV-8B Harrier last year in Carteret County, according to a report on the investigation.

Capt. Ian E. Stephenson ejected from the Cherry Point-based Harrier and walked away from the crash Feb. 13, 2008, at Open Grounds Farm.

The investigation concluded that Stephenson, of Marine Attack Squadron 542, failed to readjust his engine nozzles from the hover-stop position, making the plane incapable of staying in the air.

The $40 million jet and its $1.4 million Litening Pod targeting system were destroyed in the crash.

According to the report, Stephenson was practicing midair refueling and strike coordination with two other pilots at the time of the crash.

The pilots were returning to Cherry Point. Stephenson wrote in the investigation that he was initially trying to catch the lead aircraft in the group and realized he was coming up too fast, so he slowed the jet down by adjusting the nozzles, which forced the thrust of the aircraft down.

According to the report, Stephenson was at 12,000 feet. When he went to throttle up the aircraft again, it fell farther behind the lead pilot.

“Poppy, I need you to turn around and join on me. I’m having engine trouble,” Stephenson said by radio, according to the report. “I’m at your six, one mile, engine isn’t responding to the throttle. I’m not getting any thrust.”

According to the report, Stephenson tried several corrective measures based on training, including shutting down the engine and using the air blowing through the engine to restart it.

It didn’t work. The plane was falling, and Stephenson pointed the aircraft away from any populated areas as the plane descended.

Stephenson’s wingman advised him to switch to manuel fuel, something that had not been tried yet.

“No acceleration,” Stephenson wrote in the investigation. “I reported this to lead and said something like ‘I don’t think this is going to work.’

“I had tried all the emergency procedures that I could think of and I could not figure out what the problem was.”

The lead pilot told Stephenson to try again.

“So I shut down and tried another airstart on manual fuel,” he wrote. “I was getting fairly low, below 5,000 (feet) with a pretty high rate of descent.

“After the second airstart, I still wasn’t getting acceleration from the engine, and I was out of ideas, so I decided to eject.”

Stephenson made one last check to make sure the plane was headed toward the empty field and then pulled the ejection handle.

“After getting under canopy, I saw the jet fly away and impact to my right,” Stephenson wrote. “It was a pretty big fireball.”

Stephenson parachuted safely to the ground and walked aboard Cherry Point rescue helicopter Pedro, which arrived at the crash scene in 10 minutes, according to the report. Stephenson was on duty the next day.

According to the report, the plane went 20 feet into the ground when it crashed. Investigators, with help from the farm manager’s excavator, needed six days to recover all the parts of the jet.

The plane’s data storage unit indicated that the nozzles were in the hover-stop position at the time of the crash.

Stephenson wrote in the report that he thought he had readjusted the nozzles, but considering the crash, could not be absolutely positive that he did.

The investigating officer recommended that Stephenson be returned to flight status after undergoing refresher training at VMAT-203 and “returned to the operational force as soon as possible.”

Stephenson had 180 hours flying the AV-8B.

“The investment that has been made in him should not be thrown away because of this mishap,” the report stated.

 
Source
http://www.havenews.com/news/stephenson_5420___article.html/crash_aircraft.html

Offline tigershark

  • News Editor
  • General of Flight
  • *******
  • Posts: 2025
Re: Pilot error blamed for crash of Harrier
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2009, 05:24:23 PM »
Is a 180 hours enough not to make this kind of a mistake?  I don't know enough about pilots hours to know really, 180 doesn't seem like a lot to me. 

Offline Cheetah C

  • Pilot
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Country: za
Re: Pilot error blamed for crash of Harrier
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2009, 06:01:09 PM »
180 hours on a jet? It's not that much... maybe half a year's worth of flying in the RAF (i stand to correction on this point though) However you have to consider the total flying experience the pilot had. If he was fresh off the Hawks, he possibly had less that 1000hrs Total Time...

Perhaps we have someone from the RAF who'd know?  ;)

Offline tigershark

  • News Editor
  • General of Flight
  • *******
  • Posts: 2025
Re: Pilot error blamed for crash of Harrier
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2009, 02:45:15 AM »
Thanks Cheetah C
I thought the hours was low as well but just didn't know.  I think USAF, USN, USMC pilots are in the 225/250 hours per year range myself maybe a little more in work ups before a deployment.

 



AVIATION TOP 100 - www.avitop.com click to vote for MILAVIA